Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 30, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
typescript-eslint (source) ^8.15.0 -> ^8.17.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.17.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.16.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to ^8.16.0 fix(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to ^8.17.0 Dec 2, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 661e863 to 899ec47 Compare December 2, 2024 20:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to ^8.17.0 fix(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to ^8.17.0 - autoclosed Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot closed this Dec 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch December 8, 2024 19:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant